Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Levetiracetam Versus Phenytoin in Brain Injury: An Umbrella Review
Areeba Maryam1, Hassan Waseem2, Muhammad Ahmad Sohail3, Zain Abideen4, Brandon Lucke-Wold5, Syeda Nimra Qadri6, Esha Chaudhary7, Azka Shahab8, Sassi Abbasi9, FNU Deepak10, Aimen Zulfikar6, Zunaira Saeed6, Sania Aimen11
1Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, 2Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan, 3Shifa College of Medicine, Islamabad, Pakistan, 4King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan, 5University of Florida, Florida, United States, 6Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan, 7Islamic International Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, 8Bahria University Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan, 9Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Sindh, Pakistan, 10Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan, 11Quetta Institute of Medical Sciences, Quetta, Pakistan
Objective:

Previous meta-analyses have compared the efficacy and safety of Levetiracetam versus Phenytoin in brain injury, producing varied results. This umbrella review aims to pool evidence from these meta-analyses to draw a definitive conclusion on which drug is safer and more effective for seizure prophylaxis after brain injury.

Background:

Annually, around 1.7 million individuals in the U.S. sustain brain injuries, with 10% going on to develop seizures, which contribute to severe disabilities. Traditionally, a range of Anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) have been employed for seizure prevention.

Design/Methods:

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were searched across PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect till September 2024. The primary outcome was response rate of overall seizures. Secondary endpoints were response rates of early and late seizures, length of ICU and hospital stay, mortality, and adverse effects. The AMSTAR 2 and the Cochrane Rob 2.0 tool evaluated the reviews’ quality while the GRADE assessment analyzed the certainty of evidence. Analysis was performed on Review Manager 5.4.1 employing a random effects model.

Results:

Six systematic reviews and meta-analyses including 13,841 patients were included. Levetiracetam showed no significant improvement in response rate of overall seizures (RR= 0.72; 95% CI: [0.45,1.15]; p=0.16; I2=64%), early (RR= 0.81; 95% CI: [0.63,1.04]; p=0.10; I2=0%) and late seizures (RR= 0.77; 95% CI: [0.47,1.26]; p=0.30; I2=0%). The length of the hospital stay (MD=0.49; 95% CI: [-2.91,3.90]; p=0.78; I2=60%) and ICU stay (MD= -1.27; 95% CI: [-3.30,0.75]; p=0.22; I2=73%) were also comparable. Levetiracetam was associated with decreased adverse effects (RR= 0.60; 95% CI: [0.45,0.79]; p=0.0003; I2=1%) but the overall mortality rate was higher in it (RR= 1.18; 95% CI: [1.01,1.38]; p=0.04; I2=0%).

Conclusions:

Levetiracetam has comparable efficacy to phenytoin with a better safety profile and increased mortality. This suggests the need for more rigorous research to gain a definite conclusion.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000212034
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.