Comparing Tenecteplase, Reteplase, and Alteplase in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Hassan Waseem1, Zain abideen2, Muhammad Ansari3, Areeba Shoaib4, Muhammad Osama5, Muhammad Abdullah Ali5, Rowaid Ahmad3, Sania Aimen6
1Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan, 2King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan, 3University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston Texas, United States, 4Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan, 5Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan, 6Quetta Institute of Medical Sciences, Quetta, Pakistan
Objective:

This study aims to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of reteplase, alteplase, and tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Background:

The efficacy of tenecteplase in comparison to alteplase is well-researched. Reteplase, a more affordable alternative thrombolytic agent with a longer plasma half-life and reduced fibrin specificity, may have enhanced AIS-related outcomes.

Design/Methods:

We searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Cochrane Central up to September 2024. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis using the “netmeta” package in R v4.4.1. Risk ratios (RR) along with 95% CIs were pooled using a random effects model. Treatment ranking was performed using the p-scores. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and publication bias through funnel plots.

Results:

The results from 14 randomized trials were included. Higher mortality rates were reported by reteplase (RR= 3.14, 95% CI: [1.29, 7.61]) and tenecteplase (RR= 3.17, 95% CI: [2.27, 4.43]) when compared to alteplase. Reteplase (RR= 4.95, 95% CI: [3.92, 6.25]) and tenecteplase (RR=3.05, 95% CI: [2.77, 3.36]) significantly improved excellent functional outcomes however, the highest risk for poor functional outcomes was also demonstrated by reteplase (RR=3.14, 95%CI: [1.34,7.37]) and tenecteplase (RR=2.96, 95% CI: [2.23, 3.94]). Major neurological improvement at 72h showed increased association with tenecteplase (RR=3.68, 95%CI: [2.70, 5.02]) and reteplase (RR=3.64, 95% CI: [2.04,6.49]). A higher incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) corresponded to tenecteplase (RR=4.16, 95% CI: [2.33,7.41]); reteplase did not show any significant association.

Conclusions:

Despite enhanced functional recovery, reteplase demonstrated a higher risk of poor outcomes. Alteplase optimally reduced mortality, sICH, and poor functional outcomes whereas tenecteplase attained neurological improvement most effectively. The clinicians must tailor thrombolytic regimens after computing baseline characteristics to weigh the risks against the benefits.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000211944
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.