Relationship Between Social Determinants of Health and Patient-reported General Self-efficacy Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury Clinic Patients
Amanda Fang1, Claire Joyner1, Arunima Kapoor1, Alexis Conrad1, Maral Sakayan1, Michael Lopez1, Areg Grigorian2, Sigrid Burruss2, Saef Izzy3, Danh Nguyen4, Bernadette Boden-Albala5, Patrick Chen1
1Neurology Traumatic Brain Injury & Concussion (NTBIC) Program, Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, 2Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, 3Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, 5Department of Health Society and Behavior, Joe C. Wen School of Population and Public Health, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA
Objective:

To examine the relationship between social determinants of health (SDOH) on patient-centered measures in TBI-clinic patients.

Background:

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can lead to chronic physical, mental, and social disability, yet SDOH remains an understudied area in the context of TBI patient recovery. NIH-PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) provides novel person-centered measures that evaluate quality of life, but its use in TBI is unknown. We hypothesize that certain SDOH are related to improved self-efficacy (confidence in performing tasks/behaviors) defined by the PROMIS General Self-Efficacy (GSE) measure post-TBI.

Design/Methods:

Retrospective cohort study of sequential TBI-clinic visits in the University of California Irvine-NTBIC database (9/2022-8/2024). Inclusion criteria: ≥18yo, self-reported TBI history per 2023-ACRM criteria. SDOH defined as: non-white race, Hispanic ethnicity, non-college educated, no insurance, median census tract 2022 income. Outcome: PROMIS-GSE dichotomized as below (“poor”) or above (“good”) 50th percentile T-score. Descriptive statistics, multivariable logistic regression, and Pearson correlation performed.

Results:

Among 50 patients studied (median age=50, 50% female, 76% mild TBI, 6 months from TBI-to-clinic), age, sex, race/ethnicity, education level, and insurance status did not differ between poor versus good PROMIS-GSE outcomes (p>.05). Median-area income was significantly higher for those with good PROMIS-GSE scores (median [IQR], $117,461 [$106,920-$128,839]) versus those with poor scores ($102,065 [$88,538-$116,104], p=.022). Median-area incomes above the California-household median income predicted good PROMIS-GSE outcomes on regression (OR=11.3, 95% CI: 2.33-89, p=.006). PROMIS-GSE scores were moderately correlated to Glasgow Outcome-Extended Scale (r=.369).

Conclusions:

Our exploratory analysis suggests higher median area income is associated with higher general self-efficacy post-TBI. We demonstrate the feasibility of implementing a PROMIS measure to a predominantly subacute-chronic mild-TBI cohort. Future work will test other PROMIS batteries and longitudinally measure PROMIS scores.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000211650
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.