Closing the Care Divide in Rett Syndrome: Connecting Centers of Excellence With Community Clinicians Through a Multidisciplinary, Multiphase, Geotargeted Educational Initiative
Vandana Gupta1, Carole Drexel1, David Lieberman2, Theresa Bartolotta3, Henry Hasson4, Dallas Armstrong5, Karen Keough6, Amitha Ananth7
1PlatformQ Health, 2Boston Children'S Hospital, 3Thomas Jefferson University, 4Henry Hasson, 5CHOP, 6Child Neurology Consultants of Austin, 7University of Alabama at Birmingham/Pediatric Neurology
Objective:
To address diagnostic and treatment challenges to accessing equitable care for Rett syndrome (RTT) in “care deserts” (where RTT care is sparse) through continuing medical education.
Background:
With the approval of the first treatment for RTT, community-based neurologists must be prepared to address the unique needs of patients with RTT.
Design/Methods:
An educational 3-phase initiative was broadcast nationally with a geotargeted marketing strategy to 4 “care deserts” across the United States. Multidisciplinary faculty panels paired community-based clinicians with those from COEs, leveraging an ECHO model. Phase 1 addressed diagnostic challenges. Phase 2 addressed challenges local to each “care desert”. Phase 3 discussed multidisciplinary best practices in RTT care in community settings.
Results:
As of October 2, 2024, 947 clinicians have participated in the initiative (82% neurologists, with 66% in care deserts). Participating in the serialized activities resulted in increased confidence among clinicians related to counseling caregivers about new therapies (52% pre vs 88% post) and improved awareness of how to integrate novel therapies (57% pre vs 88% post) and address RTT multidisciplinary care needs (47% pre vs 88% post). The most commonly reported practice changes related to treatment selection (49%) and team-based collaboration (38%). Barriers to implementing change varied regionally and included lack of knowledge regarding evidence-based strategies (40%) and lack of resources to implement change (25%).
Conclusions:
Data support the effectiveness of the educational initiative in addressing knowledge and practice gaps related to RTT care among community-based neurologists. Barriers to change and deficits in knowledge highlight a need for additional educational and systemic interventions.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.