Intermittent Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Improves Language and Functional Connectivity in Primary Progressive Aphasia
Thiago Paranhos1, Anna Du1, Watson Nneka1, Daisy Hochberg1, Megan Quimby1, Neguine Rezaii1, Bonnie Wong1, Yuta Katsumi1, Bradford Dickerson1, Mark Eldaief1, Alexandra Touroutoglou1
1Frontotemporal Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Objective:
The goal of this study was to examine the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on language and language network functional connectivity in a cohort of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) patients.
Background:
PPA refers to a clinical syndrome presenting with language impairment with relative preservation of other cognitive functions. Neuroimaging evidence suggests that the language network, anchored in left prefrontal and temporo-parietal cortices, is selectively affected in PPA. To date, no pharmacological or neuromodulation strategies can satisfactorily improve symptoms in PPA. Focal neuromodulation techniques, such as repetitive TMS (rTMS), can change resting-state functional connectivity in a network-specific manner. Thus, we investigated whether rTMS could selectively modulate functional connections within the degenerated language network in PPA.
Design/Methods:
A double-blinded, sham controlled, cross-over design was used to administer intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) for 10 days in a heterogeneous sample of PPA patients: 4 logopenic variant (lvPPA), 2 non-fluent variant (nfvPPA), 1 semantic variant (svPPA), and 3 with primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS). We stimulated the left caudal middle frontal gyrus region most functionally correlated with the language network on an individual-subject basis. Standardized language assessments were administered at baseline, post-active TMS, and post-sham TMS. Resting-state fMRI data were analyzed to probe functional connectivity changes across sessions.
Results:
We found language test improvement following active TMS in areas of weakness for the respective patients: Naming performance in lvPPA; semantic performance in svPPA; and apraxia of speech severity in nfvPPA and PPAOS. Across all subtypes, increased functional connectivity was observed in the language and other networks subserving cognitive performance after active TMS.
Conclusions:
We demonstrate preliminary evidence that personalized functional-network guided iTBS can improve language impairments in a heterogeneous PPA cohort. Furthermore, improvements in language tests were accompanied by increases in functional network connectivity, pointing to a putative neural mechanism of TMS-induced benefits in PPA.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000211451
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.