Changes in Metabolic Parameters and Determination of Minimal Clinically Important Difference in YGTSS-TTS Using Data From the Randomized Phase 2b and Open-Label Extension Studies of Ecopipam For Tourette Syndrome
Joesph F. McGuire1, George B. Karkanias2, Richard B. Bittman3, Sarah D. Atkinson2, Gage D. Messner2, Frederick E. Munschauer2, Stephen P. Wanaski4, Timothy M. Cunniff4, Donald L. Gilbert5
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2Emalex Biosciences, Inc., 3Bittman Biostat, Inc., 4Paragon Biosciences, LLC, 5Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
Objective:

To determine if ecopipam increases metabolic syndrome risk and define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in YGTSS-TTS in children/adolescents with Tourette syndrome (TS) who completed a phase 2b randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 12-month open-label extension (OLE) study.

Background:

Dopamine-2 receptor antagonists are effective in treating TS but increase the risk of metabolic syndrome. Ecopipam, an investigational dopamine-1 receptor antagonist, significantly improved YGTSS-TTS from baseline in the RCT and OLE study (30% [Month 3] and 40% [Month 12] mean improvement, respectively).

Design/Methods:

Metabolic parameter changes during RCT and OLE were analyzed with a mixed model for repeated measures and paired t-test, respectively. ROC analysis determined the percentage improvement in YGTSS-TTS that differentiated patients with improvement on Clinical Global Impression of TS Severity (CGI-TS-S; ≥1-point decrease) or Improvement (CGI-TS-I; scores ≤3) versus no change/worsening using pooled RCT and OLE data (baseline to Week 12 of ecopipam treatment).

Results:

In RCT (n=153), there were no significant differences (ecopipam vs placebo) for mean change in weight (0.07 kg), HgA1c (−0.08%), total cholesterol (−0.07 mmol/L), triglycerides (0.02 mmol/L), or systolic/diastolic BP (1.49/1.65 mmHg; P>0.10 for all). In OLE (n=121), no significant mean change was observed for BMI Z scores (0.05), HgA1c (0.03%), total cholesterol (0.2 mmol/L), triglycerides (−0.09 mmol/L), or systolic/diastolic BP (0.26/0.91 mmHg; P>0.10 for all). ROC analysis included data from 133 patients (63.2% and 78.2% had improvement on the CGI-TS-S and CGI-TS-I, respectively). Youden’s J percentage reduction cut-offs that distinguished between improvement versus no change/worsening for YGTSS-TTS were 25.0% using CGI-TS-S as anchor and 22.9% using CGI-TS-I as anchor (AUC, 0.81 and 0.78, respectively).

Conclusions:

Ecopipam did not adversely affect parameters associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome. ROC analysis suggested that ≥25% reduction in YGTSS-TTS is an appropriate minimum threshold to define clinically meaningful improvement (MCID) in this patient population.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000211256
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.