Widespread Neuroanatomical Integration and Distinct Electrophysiological Properties of Glioma-innervating Neurons
Annie Hsieh1, Sanika Ganesh2, Tomasz Kula2, Madiha Irshad3, Emily Ferenczi4, Wengang Wang2, Yi-Ching Chen2, Song-Hua Hu5, Zongyu Li5, Shakchhi Joshi5, Marcia Haigis5, Bernardo Sabatini2
1Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Neurobiology, Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, 2HHMI, Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, 3Department of Neurobiology, Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, 4Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, 5Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School
Objective:
N/A
Background:
Gliomas are the most common malignant primary brain tumors and are often associated with severe neurological deficits and mortality. Unlike many cancers, gliomas rarely metastasize outside the brain, indicating a possible dependency on unique features of brain microenvironment. Synapses between neurons and glioma cells exist, suggesting that glioma cells rely on neuronal inputs and synaptic signaling for proliferation. Yet, the locations and properties of neurons that innervate gliomas have remained elusive.
Design/Methods:
In this study, we utilized transsynaptic tracing with a EnvA-pseudotyped, glycoprotein-deleted rabies virus to specifically infect TVA and glycoprotein-expressing human glioblastoma cells in an orthotopic xenograft mouse model, allowing us to identify the neurons that form synapses onto the gliomas.
Results:
Comprehensive whole-brain mapping revealed that these glioma-innervating neurons (GINs) consistently arise at brain regions, including diverse neuromodulatory centers and specific cortical layers, known to project to the glioma locations. Molecular profiling revealed that these long-range cortical GINs are predominantly glutamatergic, and subsets express both glutamatergic and GABAergic markers, whereas local striatal GINs are largely GABAergic. Electrophysiological studies demonstrated that while GINs share passive intrinsic properties with cortex-innervating neurons, their action potential waveforms are altered.
Conclusions:
Our study introduces a novel method for identifying and mapping GINs and reveals their consistent integration into existing location-dependent neuronal networks involving diverse neurotransmitters and neuromodulators. The observed intrinsic electrophysiological differences in GINs lay the groundwork for future investigations into how these alterations may correspond with the postsynaptic characteristics of glioma cells.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000211187
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.