Risk of “False Positivity” Associates with Acetylcholine Receptor Autoantibody Titer by Radioimmunoprecipitation Assay
Pietro Zara1, Paola Chessa1, Giovanni A. Deiana1, Mariangela Puci1, Giovanni Sotgiu1, Valentina Damato3, Paolo Solla1, Elia Sechi2
1Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 2University of Sassari, 3Department of Neuroscience, University of Florence
Objective:
To determine the risk of false acetylcholine receptor (AChR)-IgG positivity by radioimmune precipitation assay (RIPA), and investigate its determinants.
Background:
RIPA is the gold standard for AChR-IgG detection in patients with suspected myasthenia gravis (MG), with a reported specificity of ≈99%. The reported risk of false AChR-IgG positivity is extremely low, although the accuracy of RIPA in large, unselected populations has not been elucidated.
Design/Methods:
Among 4795 patients consecutively tested for AChR-IgG by RIPA at the University Hospital of Sassari between January 2003-March 2022, we retrospectively identified those with: 1) AChR-IgG positivity (titer ≥0.5 nmol/L); and 2) sufficient clinical information. Medical records were reviewed by two investigators and AChR-IgG was considered falsely positive when: 1) clinical-phenotypes were not consistent with MG; and/or 2) an alternative diagnosis was identified. Specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated, and the characteristics of patients with false vs true AChR-IgG positivity compared.
Results:
Of 362 AChR-IgG-positive patients included in the study, 50 (13.8%) were designated as false positives. Specificity and PPV were 98.9% (95% CI, 98.5-99.2) and 86.2% (95% CI, 82.2-89.6), respectively. Alternative diagnoses included ocular diseases (n=8), rheumatic diseases (n=7), pseudoptosis (n=5), myopathy (n=4), isolated cranial nerve palsy (n=2), parkinsonism (n=2), demyelinating diseases (n=2), and others (n=20). Compared to patients with MG, patients with false AChR-IgG were younger (median age, 65 [range, 7-91] vs 38 [range, 5-80] years), more frequently female (155/312 [49.8%] vs 37/50 [74%]), and had lower antibody titers (median, 6 [range, 0.5-28] vs 0.7 [range, 0.5-5.5] nmol/L). After stratification by titer ≥1 nmol/L, specificity and PPV increased to 99.8% (95% CI, 99.6-99.9) and 96.6% (95% CI, 94-98.3), respectively.
Conclusions:
False AChR-IgG positivity by RIPA may occur in clinical practice, and associates with low antibody titers between 0.5-1 nmol/L. The risk of false positivity is negligible with higher AChR-IgG titers.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.