Real-world-data on Ofatumumab as First-line Treatment in Early RMS (AIOLOS study)
Gereon Nelles1, Steffen Pfeuffer2, Carola Wagner3
1Neuromed-Campus, 2University Hospital Giessen, 3Novartis Pharma GmbH
Objective:

The non-interventional study (NIS) AIOLOS evaluates ofatumumab, interferon β1 (IFN-β1) or glatiramer acetate (GA) in treatment-naïve RMS patients who do not meet the highly-active disease criteria in daily clinical routine in Germany.

Background:

Ofatumumab, a fully human monoclonal aCD20 antibody, showed superior efficacy and comparable safety versus teriflunomide in the Phase 3 ASCLEPIOS I/II overall population and in various subgroups, including recently diagnosed treatment-naive and in non-highly active participants. Furthermore, ofatumumab demonstrated sustained efficacy for up to 6 years in all those populations in the ALITHIOS open-label extension.

Design/Methods:

This prospective NIS enrolls treatment-naïve RMS patients who do not meet the highly-active disease criteria and either initiate ofatumumab or other self-administered injectable therapies (IFN-β1/GA). Primary data is collected via questionnaires and electronic case report forms and includes clinical parameters for effectiveness, safety, and tolerability as well as various patient reported outcomes.

Results:

The interim analysis included 302 ofatumumab patients and 82 patients treated with IFN-β1/GA as first-line treatment. Baseline and demographic parameters were balanced overall, but also show that ofatumumab patients tend to have higher disease activity before baseline compared to IFN-β1/GA patients. Fewer ofatumumab patients discontinued therapy, resulting in a higher retention rate at one year compared to the IFN-β1/GA cohort. Compared to IFN-β1/GA, fewer ofatumumab patients experienced serious adverse events (SAEs) and experienced AEs leading to study drug discontinuation. IFN-β1/GA patients experienced a higher proportion of injection site reactions, while ofatumumab patients experienced more injection systemic reactions, mostly within the first month of treatment.

Conclusions:

This interim analysis on real-world use of ofatumumab in treatment-naive RMS patients who do not meet the highly-active disease criteria is in line with data from the pivotal ofatumumab trials and confirms the favorable benefit-risk profile of ofatumumab as first-line treatment. The data provide insights into the RMS patient population treated with different self-administered first-line therapies.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000211109
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.