Needles in Haystacks: A Cross-Sectional Study of Community-Engaged Research in High-Impact General Neurology Journals
Sydney Bitting1, Amy Tao2, Erin Friel3, Jasmin Rivero-Guerra3, Davis Hobley2, Selena Xiang2, Rachel Batchelor4, Shria Ajay2, Athena Apaga2, Daniel Choi2, Rebekah Choi2, Gabriela de Jesus Rios2, Larry Ejiofor2, Judy Gao2, Jasmine Hao2, Daniel Kim2, Angelica Lappay2, Jason Lu2, Zaighum Nagra2, Patricia Okoye2, Aarane Ratnaseelan5, Chloe Riche2, Karina Saba3, Diana Stinkova2, Kathleen Tang2, Luiza Weissmann3, Emily Yeow2, Maya Ragavan3, Christina Briscoe Abath6, Laura Kirkpatrick3
1Northeast Ohio Medical University, 2Princeton University, 3University of Pittsburgh, 4Worcester College - University of Oxford, 5UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 6Boston Children's Hospital
Objective:
To understand the prevalence of community-engaged research in high-impact general neurology journals that publish clinical research.
Background:
Community-engaged research (CER) involves people directly affected by research studies (such as patients and caregivers) in research governance and decision-making rather than only as research participants. CER has been promoted as a more equitable and ethical model of research. Little is known about the uptake of CER in neurology, particularly in high-visibility journals.
Design/Methods:
We manually screened original clinical research articles published from 2012-2022 in four journals (Neurology, Annals of Neurology, JAMA Neurology, and Lancet Neurology) for keywords suggestive of CER, using methods described elsewhere by Ragavan et al. The senior investigator reviewed all articles that flagged positive for CER keywords to determine if and how CER was reported.
Results:

We screened 6849 articles and 779 included CER keywords in the Methods section. Of those, 35 (0.5%) reported CER. The most common methods of community engagement included incorporation of patients or caregivers on advisory boards or steering committees (n=17, 49%), community member involvement in culturally tailoring and delivering interventions (n=4, 11%), and community member involvement in designing and testing psychometric instruments (n=4, 11%). Most common diseases under investigation were dementia (n=11, 31%), stroke (n=6, 17%), and muscular dystrophy (n=6, 17%). Most common study designs included clinical trials (n=13, 27%), cohort studies (n=9, 26%), and cross-sectional studies (n=9, 26%). Only one (3%) study reported including children or youth in research governance though nine (26%) included children as participants with three (9%) recruiting children only. One (3%) study was published from 2012-2014, 8 (23%) studies from 2015-2017, 9 (26%) studies from 2018-2020, and 17 (50%) studies from 2021-2022.

Conclusions:
Few articles published in high-impact general neurology journals explicitly report CER though the frequency of publication of such articles appears to be increasing over time.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000211029
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.