Assessing the Rate and Causes of Myasthenia Gravis Misdiagnosis
Silvia Falso1, Michela Myriam De Maio1, Sofia Marini1, Martina Marini1, Federico Habetswallner1, Raffaele Iorio2
1Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli
Objective:

To evaluate the rate and underlying causes of misdiagnosis in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG).

Background:
MG presents diagnostic challenges, particularly in seronegative cases. While increased disease awareness and availability of advanced diagnostic tests have contributed to a rise in MG diagnosis, they also introduce the risk of overdiagnosis. Accurate diagnosis is crucial given the emergence of novel therapies that target MG specifically. 
Design/Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients referred to our tertiary MG clinic for a second opinion between January 2019 and July 2024, following an initial MG diagnosis.
Results:

A total of 106 patients were referred for a second opinion after receiving an MG diagnosis. Of these, 23 (21.7%) were found to have been misdiagnosed. Twelve of 23 (52.2%) were seronegative; low-titre acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AChR-Abs) were detected in 10/23 (43.5%), in 7/10 by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and in 3/10 by ELISA, muscle-specific kinase antibodies (MuSK-Abs) were detected in one; in all patients positivity was not confirmed by fixed cell-based assay and in 7/9 who repeated RIA. In 6 subjects, a prior electrodiagnostic study was deemed positive: 4 patients had abnormal repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) and single-fiber electromyography showed minimal or equivocal abnormalities in two. Repeated RNS did not confirm previous results in 4/4. Median duration of misdiagnosis was 39 months [1-196]. All but 4 subjects had received anticholinesterase therapy, immunosuppressive treatment was started in 15/23 (65.2%) and 2 underwent thymectomy.

Conclusions:

MG misdiagnosis is not rare and often leads to years of unnecessary treatment. The main factors contributing to MG misdiagnosis are atypical clinical presentations, false positive antibody results and neurophysiological testing performed with insufficient expertise. These findings highlight the importance of experienced clinical judgment in MG diagnosis, along with the appropriate use of antibody testing and neurophysiological studies within the right clinical context.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000210780
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.