Neurology Program Directors' Perspectives on Fellowship Counseling: Mentorship, Wellness, and Barriers
Mark Terrelonge1, Joseph Sanford2, Bridget O'Brien1
1University of California, San Francisco, 2UCSF Fresno
Objective:

To explore neurology residency program directors' (PDs) perspectives on fellowship career counseling.

Background:

While most neurology residents pursue fellowship training, many report feeling underinformed about this decision. PDs are directly or indirectly involved in fellowship career counseling, yet how intentional they are about this counseling role varies. PDs may face barriers to optimally supporting residents’ choices. Understanding their perspectives would help inform strategies to improve residents’ experiences during this process.

Design/Methods:

We conducted semi-structured interviews with seven neurology PDs from diverse academic, community, adult, and pediatric programs, spanning various career stages. Template analysis was used to analyze interview transcripts. Initial coding was informed by existing literature, and the template was refined iteratively based on the first three interviews. We identified themes by reviewing excerpts of coded data.

Results:

We identified three preliminary themes:

(1) PDs prioritize strategic mentorship guidance: Several PDs highlighted the importance of actively connecting residents with appropriate subspecialty mentors early in training. These connections, more than subspecialty exposure alone, were seen as pivotal in shaping residents' fellowship decisions. PDs felt it is important to help residents distinguish mentors’ enthusiasm from the realities of field.

(2) PDs address residents’ wellness priorities: PDs noted that current residents place a higher value on work-life balance and job satisfaction when choosing fellowship. They felt responsible for making sure residents had a realistic preview of the subspecialty work experience to ensure residents were well-informed.    

(3) PDs overcome institutional barriers with external opportunities: PDs acknowledged that institutional service demands, limited subspecialty availability within their institution, and fellowship application timelines hindered fellowship exposure. PDs counter this by creating external opportunities including specialty specific conferences, scholarships, and external rotations to help inform choices.
Conclusions:
PDs play an active role in supporting residents’ fellowship decisions through mentorship matching, diverse clinical exposure, and reality checking with residents. 
10.1212/WNL.0000000000210692
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.