Relationship between Cycling of Traditional Oral Generic Preventive Medications and Patient-Reported Outcomes: US Results from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes – International Study
Dawn Buse1, Fumihiko Sakai2, Manjit Matharu3, Kristina Fanning4, Pranav Gandhi5, Brett Dabruzzo6, Richard Lipton7
1Dawn C. Buse, PhD, 2Saitama International Headache Center, 3University College London, 4MIST Research, 5AbbVie, 6AbbVie Medical Affairs, 7Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Objective:
Evaluate the relationship between the number of traditional oral generic preventive medications (OGPMs) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in US respondents of the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes–International (CaMEO-I) study.
Background:
OGPMs are often associated with suboptimal efficacy, contraindications, or side effects, leading to high discontinuation rates and cycling through multiple medications.
Design/Methods:
CaMEO-I was a cross-sectional, web-based survey conducted in 2021-2022 in six countries. Respondents with ICHD-3 migraine were stratified by self-reported history of ever using 1, 2, or ≥3 OGPMs; those who had used branded preventive medication(s) were excluded. Associations between OGPM use and migraine-related disability (Migraine Disability Assessment Scale [MIDAS] Grade III or IV), cognitive impairment (Migraine Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire [MCIQ]), quality of life (Migraine Specific Quality of Life [MSQ]), allodynia (ASC-12), and functional disability (FDS) were assessed. Linear trend tests, using chi-square for categorical variables and ANOVA for continuous variables, were conducted to determine if the severity of outcomes increased with number of OGPMs.
Results:
In total, 19.6% (472/2404) of US respondents with migraine had ever used at least 1 OGPM (mean [SD] age 43.5 [12.69] years, 72.2% female). Of these, 36.0% (170/472) had used 1 OGPM, 22.9% (108/472) had used 2 OGPMs, and 41.1% (194/472) had used ≥3 OGPMs. Cycling OGPMs was associated with greater disability on MIDAS (1: 54.1% [73/170], 2: 67.6% [73/108], ≥3: 71.6% [139/194]; p=0.024), greater cognitive impairment on MCIQ (1: 67.6% [115/170], 2: 70.4% [76/108], ≥3: 77.8% [151/194], p=0.029) and reduced score on the MSQ role function restrictive domain (mean [SD] 1: 56.9 [22.90]; 2: 53.2 [20.95]; 3: 46.3 [22.51]; p<0.001]). Cycling OGPMs was also associated with increased allodynia and reductions in the performance of daily activities and on MSQ role function preventive and emotional function domains.
Conclusions:
Cycling through OGPMs was associated with greater disability, higher cognitive impairment, and decreased QoL.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.