Capturing What Matters: Patient Reported LGI1-ANTibody Encephalitis Outcome RatiNg Scale (LANTERN)
Mark Kelly1, Barbara Wagner2, Bryan Ceronie3, Christine Strippel3, Ann Lin3, Adam Handel4, John Soltys5, Sophie Binks3, Sarosh Irani5, Philip Powell6
1Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 23. Department of Neurology, Kantonsspital Aarau, 3Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, 4University of Oxford, 5Mayo Clinic, 6Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield
Objective:
To develop a disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for LGI1-antibody-encephalitis (LGI1-Ab-E), to be used in clinical and research practice.
Background:
LGI1-Ab-E is a common form of autoimmune encephalitis where most patients demonstrate ‘good’ clinician-rated outcomes. However, more targeted questionnaires reveal numerous experience-debilitating symptoms for many years. To better quantify these persistent features, we designed LGI1-ANTibody-Encephalitis RatiNg (LANTERN), a quantified, disease-specific PROM.
Design/Methods:
A participant-driven mixed-methods approach, advocated by FDA guidelines, to develop a clinically valid questionnaire over three stages: (1) Item generation through semi-structured interviews; (2) Repeated cognitive debriefing rounds to advance comprehensibility, relevance, and comprehensiveness (3) A psychometric survey to condense the most sensitive and valid questions. Analyses incorporated sensitivity-testing and multiple internal and external validations.
Results:
From
73 items across six domains (Stage 1; n=18), a questionnaire assessing frequency and severity of 43 symptoms (80 questions), plus nine activities of daily living (ADL), was developed through cognitive debriefing (Stage 2, n=15). In Stage 3, this 89-question survey was completed (n=66 patients and 32 relatives) and distilled, using exploratory factor analyses, to a three-factor symptom-burden questionnaire comprising 41 questions (19 symptoms and 6 ADL), separated into physical, cognitive/behavioural and ADL domains. These factors demonstrated strong internal reliability (Cronbach alpha: 0.85-0.91), correlations with relative-completed questionnaires (R=0.73-0.85;P<0.001), good-to-excellent intra-class re-testing correlations (0.81-0.98; N=19) and strong associations with numerous predefined external measures.
Conclusions:
LANTERN represents a PROM for LGI1-Ab-E, with initial content, structural and construct validity, and test-retest reliability. It can be used as a tailored and sensitive method to estimate symptom burden over time in people with LGI1-Ab-E, both in clinical practice and trials.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.