Neighborhood Disadvantage is Not Associated with Exposure to NMOSD Treatment
Kaitlyn Palmer1, Devon Conway1, Mengke Du2, Albert Aboseif3, Carol Swetlik4, Julie Widmar1, Amy Kunchok1, Deborah Miller1, Julia O'Mahony1, Justin Abbatemarco1
1Mellen Center, 2Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, 3Mayo Clinic Rochester, 4MetroHealth
Objective:
To assess whether neighborhood-level disadvantage is associated with time to initiation of an immunosuppressive therapy (IST) among persons with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (pwNMOSD).
Background:
Little is known about the relationship between neighborhood-level disadvantage and exposure to NMOSD-specific IST. 
Design/Methods:
This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-positive NMOSD diagnosed after the first FDA approved NMOSD-specific IST became available (eculizumab, January 2019). We created four multivariable cox proportional hazards regression models to evaluate whether time from NMOSD diagnosis to first exposure to an NMOSD-specific IST (rituximab, satralizumab, inebilizumab, or eculizumab) was associated with neighborhood disadvantage. Neighborhood disadvantage (yes or no) was defined as being in the most disadvantaged 15% of Americans in terms of financial strength, educational attainment, economic hardship/inequality, or overall area deprivation index (ADI). We adjusted for race, insurance, and education level. 
Results:
We included 38 AQP4-positive NMOSD participants: mean age at diagnosis was 47.6±18.8 years, 82.0% female, 49.0% non-White who were followed for a mean of 1.3±1.1 years since diagnosis. During follow-up for this study, 25 (65.9%) of 38 participants were exposed to an NMOSD-specific IST. Participants who initiated an NMOSD-specific IST did not differ from those who did not in terms of insurance, race, rural-urban commuting area codes, or ADI (p>0.05 for all).  Time from NMOSD diagnosis to initiation of an NMOSD-specific IST did not associate with neighborhood disadvantage, including financial strength (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, p=0.21), educational attainment (HR 2.76, p=0.18), economic hardship/inequality (HR 0.37, p=0.26), or overall deprivation (HR 0.33, p=0.27).
Conclusions:
Neighborhood disadvantage did not associate with likelihood of exposure or time to initiation of an NMOSD-specific IST, suggesting that disadvantage was not a barrier to treatment in our small cohort. Notably, one-third of pwNMOSD were never exposed to an NMOSD-specific IST, regardless of disadvantage, which warrants further investigation. 
10.1212/WNL.0000000000210520
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.