Animal Model of anti-NMDAR Encephalitis by Active Immunization: Insights into the Neuro-Immunobiology and Therapeutic Interventions
Estibaliz Maudes1, Jesús Planagumà1, Laura Marmolejo1, Marija Radosevic1, Ana Beatriz Serafim1, Esther Aguilar1, Carlos Sindreu1, Jon Landa1, Anna García-Serra1, Francesco Mannara1, Marina Cunquero2, Anna Smith1, Chiara Milano1, Paula Peixoto-Moledo1, Mar Guasp3, Raquel Ruiz-García3, Sarah Gray4, Marianna Spatola1, Pablo Loza-Alvarez2, Lidia Sabater1, Carlos Matute5, Josep Dalmau1
1IDIBAPS-CaixaResearch Institute, 2ICFO-Institut de Ciències Fotòniques, 3Hospital Clínic Barcelona - IDIBAPS, 4Sage Therapeutics, 5Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience
Objective:

To develop a mouse model of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis (NMDARe) that allows comprehensive neuro-immunobiological investigations and the assessment of potential therapies.

Background:
NMDARe occurs with severe neuropsychiatric symptoms and often improves with immunotherapy. Current animal models do not provide comprehensive physiopathological insights or a clinical course long enough to assess new therapies.
Design/Methods:

Eight-week-old female C57BL/6J mice were immunized with GluN1356-385 peptide (or saline) along with AddaVax (adjuvant that favors B-cell autoimmunity) and pertussis toxin, followed by systematically examinations for behavioral and neuro-immunobiological changes. Treatment groups received an anti-CD20, a positive allosteric modulator of NMDAR (NMDAR-PAM, SGE-301), or both. GluN1-antibody synthesis, epitope spreading, antibody effects on NMDAR density and function, brain immunological infiltrates, microglial activation, and antibody synthesis by cultured inguinal (ILN) and deep cervical lymph nodes (DCLN) were assessed by immunohistochemistry, calcium imaging, confocal and super-resolution microscopy, electrophysiology, and flow cytometry. Changes in memory and behavior were assessed with a panel of behavioral tests, and clinical/subclinical seizures with brain-implanted electrodes.

Results:

Immunized mice, but not controls, developed serum and CSF NMDAR-antibodies, showing epitope spreading and reduced synaptic NMDAR clusters and hippocampal plasticity. Additionally, they had brain-bound antibodies, inflammatory infiltrates (mainly B- and plasma cells), microglia activation, and presence of NMDAR/IgG complexes in microglial endosomes. Cultured DCLN showed NMDAR-antibody synthesis. These findings were associated with psychotic-like behavior, memory deficits, increased seizure susceptibility, and abnormal movements. Treatment with anti-CD20, NMDAR-PAM or both, reversed most neurobiological and behavioral abnormalities. Repopulation of B cells was associated with re-emergence of clinical-neurobiological alterations, which were abrogated by the NMDAR-PAM.

Conclusions:

This model offers an all-inclusive neuro-immunobiology of the disease, allowing testing novel treatments, supporting the therapeutic potential of NMDAR-PAM, and suggesting an immunological paradigm of brain NMDAR-epitope spreading, which along the DCLN might contribute to fine-tuning the immune response.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000208798
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.