Effectiveness of Hippotherapy in Balance Rehabilitation for Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Moaz Abouelmagd1, Asmaa Zakria Alnajjar2, Ahmed Elshahat3, Belal Mohamed3, Ismail Ibrahim4, Ahmed Abdelaziz3
1Kasr-alainy faculty of medicine, Cairo University, Egypt, 2Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Gaza, Palestine., 3Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt, 4Faculty of Health Sciences, Fenerbahce University, Istanbul, Turkey
Objective:
This study aims to summarize the evidence on the effect of hippotherapy on postural control and balance in stroke patients
Background:
hemiparesis and balance impairments are common post-stroke complications, affecting the functional capacity and daily life activities of patients. Hippotherapy, a therapeutic intervention using horses or mechanical devices, has shown promise in improving stroke patients' balance, postural control, and mobility.
Design/Methods:
This study followed PRISMA guidelines for systematic review. The search was conducted through major databases like PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and CENTRAL with relevant keywords. Review manager software was used for meta-analysis.
Results:
Ten studies were included in our systematic review. Seven studies were included in our meta-analysis compromising evidence from 238 patients. Hippotherapy was found to provide superior balance scores compared to control on the Berg balance scale (MD= 1.72, 95% CI= [1.38, 2.07], P<000.1) and timed up-and-go test (MD= -2.97 seconds, 95% CI= [-4.83, -1.11], P=0.002). These improvements were also found in other measurement tools such as the 10-meter-walk test and the center of pressure test.
Conclusions:
Our results suggest that hippotherapy may provide a better alternative to traditional exercise for post-stroke balance rehabilitation. However, further large RCT studies are needed to support the robustness of our results.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000208740
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.