Clarification of the Mechanism of Action of Cenobamate
Raman Sankar1, Louis Ferrari2
1University of California Los Angeles, 2SK Life Science, Inc.
Objective:
Characterize cenobamate’s mechanism of action (MOA) based on currently available evidence.
Background:
In phase 2 trials, cenobamate demonstrated a robust antiseizure effect in patients with difficult-to-treat focal seizures, including focal aware motor, focal impaired awareness, and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic. 
Design/Methods:
We review the available evidence and provide further insight on cenobamate’s MOA. 
Results:
Preclinical studies showed that cenobamate exerts effects on voltage-gated sodium channels (NaV) and GABAA receptors. The INaP contributes to the generation of a paroxysmal depolarization shift, which may serve as a basis for epileptic foci. There is an increase in INaP in spontaneously bursting hippocampal neurons after epileptogenic stimuli such as experimental status epilepticus. In preclinical studies, cenobamate modulated NaV by preferential blockade of the INaP, while sparing the transient sodium current (INaT). It is likely that by sparing the INaT, cenobamate does not interfere with fast-spiking GABAergic interneuron function, thus preserving network inhibition. The effect of cenobamate’s selective INaP block on the resting membrane potential is augmented by its positive allosteric modulation of GABAA receptor-mediated tonic currents. This effect was not reversed by flumazenil and cenobamate did not displace flunitrazepam binding, which suggests positive allosteric GABAA modulation via non-benzodiazepine binding sites. The combined effects of limiting INaP while augmenting tonic GABA-mediated chloride currents effectively suppress the epileptiform activity of principal neurons. Cenobamate’s selectivity for the INaP over INaT likely represents action on the NaV1.6 channel over the NaV1.1 channel and is a feature not shared by traditional antiseizure medications like phenytoin or carbamazepine.
Conclusions:
Cenobamate selectively inhibits INaP, which may involve preferential action at NaV1.6 over NaV1.1 channels, while sparing INaT. Sparing the INaT is critical for preserving the inhibitory activity of fast-spiking interneurons. This effect on INaP may be enhanced by cenobamate’s positive allosteric modulation of tonic (extrasynaptic) GABAA receptors.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000208526
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.