Comparative Safety of Istradefylline in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-world Studies
Sagari Bette1, Joyce Qian2, Hannah Cummings2, Katsumi Shinoda3, Hiroo Shimoda3, Ashley Thai2, Sarah Batson4, Stephen Mitchell4, Gabrielle Redhead4, Daniel Truong5
1Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton, 2Kyowa Kirin Inc., 3Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., 4Mtech Access, 5PMDI
Objective:

To assess the relative safety of istradefylline vs. other Parkinson’s Disease (PD) adjuncts based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence (RWE).

Background:

Istradefylline has demonstrated a significant reduction in “OFF” time when used as an adjunct to levodopa/carbidopa in patients with PD.

Design/Methods:

A systematic search for studies published until January 1st, 2024 was conducted. Relative safety was estimated using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs and presented as OR [95% credible interval (CrI)]. Random and fixed-effect models were explored for all outcomes. Inconsistency was assessed through loop-specific approach and heterogeneity was evaluated by global I² statistic and between-study heterogeneity. Incidence rates of safety outcomes were summarized from RWE.

Results:

A total of 100 RCTs and 55 RWE publications met the predefined inclusion criteria, and 76 RCTs (n=22,967 patients) were included in NMA. Istradefylline demonstrated lower odds of hallucination (OR=0.25 [95%CrI: 0.06, 0.97]), treatment-emergent AEs (0.43 [0.25, 0.73]), treatment-related AEs (0.33 [0.19, 0.56]), serious AEs (0.56 [0.32, 0.99]), and withdrawals due to AEs (0.37 [0.19, 0.68]) vs. amantadine. Istradefylline demonstrated lower odds of hypotension vs. catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors (COMTis) (0.19 [0.03, 0.82]) and monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors (MAO-Bis) (0.09 [0.01, 0.52]), lower odds of dyskinesia (0.63 [0.40, 0.99]) vs. COMTis, and lower odds of nausea (0.57 [0.33, 0.99]) vs. dopamine agonists (DAs). In a sensitivity analysis of RCTs after year 2000, there was a reduction in the odds of dyskinesia (0.55 [0.38, 0.82]) and hallucination (0.41 [0.16, 1.00]) for istradefylline vs. DAs. RWE data were heterogenous but indicate that istradefylline displayed a lower incidence of dyskinesia compared with MAO‑Bis, somnolence compared with DAs and COMTis, nausea compared with all comparators, and peripheral edema and hallucinations compared with amantadine.

Conclusions:

Overall, istradefylline exhibits a favorable safety profile compared to other PD adjunct therapies, as demonstrated by both RCTs and RWE.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000208502
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.