Low-field, Portable Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Hematoma Volume in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients
Julia Zabinska1, Vineetha Yadlapalli2, Mercy Mazurek3, Nethra Parasuram1, Dheeraj Lalwani4, Emma Peasley5, Emily Gilmore2, Jennifer Kim2, Sacit Bulent Omay6, Gordon Sze1, Sam Payabvash1, Annabel Sorby-Adams7, Juan Iglesias7, Matthew Rosen7, William Taylor Kimberly7, Kevin Sheth8
1Yale School of Medicine, 2Yale University School of Medicine, 3Harvard Medical School, 4Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, 5Yale University, 6Yale Univ, 7Harvard University, 8Yale University Division of Neuro and Critical Care
Objective:

We deployed a low-field (0.064 T) magnetic resonance imaging (LF-MRI) device in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and investigated the agreement between traumatic intraparenchymal hematoma (IPH) volumes demonstrated on LF-MRI and conventional neuroimaging (non-contrast computed tomography (CT) or 1.5/3T MRI).

Background:

CT is the gold standard neuroimaging modality for diagnosing and monitoring patients with TBI. TBI patients require frequent neurological assessments to inform care management in the acute setting of brain insult and after interventions such as decompressive craniectomy. The advent of LF-MRI allows for frequent, accessible neuromonitoring of TBI patients in these settings.

Design/Methods:

LF-MRI examinations were performed on patients with traumatic IPH in the neuroscience/surgical intensive care units (ICU) and emergency department (ED) from August 2020-April 2023. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences were obtained at the bedside using a portable, LF-MRI device (Hyperfine, Inc). 15 exams were completed within 72 hours of conventional imaging, while one exam was completed 92 hours after and one exam was completed nine days after conventional imaging. Lesion volumes from each patient’s LF-MRI exam and closest conventional imaging study (CT or 1.5/3T MRI) were manually segmented using 3D Slicer (v5.4.0). Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to assess agreement between lesion volumes on LF-MRI and conventional imaging.

Results:

We examined 17 patients (ages 20-94, 19% female) with traumatic IPH. Of these, three patients received one neurosurgical intervention (mini craniotomy, craniectomy, and decompressive hemicraniectomy) and one patient received two neurosurgical interventions (burr hole and craniectomy) before their LF-MRI scan. The median [range] GCS at the time of the LF-MRI scan was 14 [3-15]. Lesion volumes manually segmented on LF-MRI exams strongly correlated with conventional imaging volumes (ICC = 0.981, 95% CI: [0.948-0.993], p<0.001).

Conclusions:

Portable, low-field MRI is a safe and practical neuroimaging tool that may complement existing conventional modalities and support management of critically ill TBI patients.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000208210