Zavegepant Intranasal Spray for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Mainak Bardhan1, Vinay Suresh2, Tirth Dave3, Muhammad Aaqib Shamim4, Dilip Suresh5, Poorvikha Satish6, Bishal Dhakal7, Aman Bhonsale8, Priyanka Roy9, Teshamae Monteith10
1Neuro Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute,Baptist Health South Florida, 2King George's Medical University, 3Bukovinian State Medical University, 4All India Institute of Medical Science - Jodhpur, 5Madras Medical College, 6St John’s Medical College, 7Bardibas Field Hospital, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, 8All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, 9Directorate of Factories, Department of Labour, Government of West Bengal, 10Neurology, University of Miami, Millar school of Medicine
Objective:
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of zavegepant, a recently approved third-generation small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, administered as a nasal spray (BHV-3500) for the acute treatment of migraine attacks.
Background:
Zavegepant, a third generation small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonist, is the first intranasally administered option and was recently approved by the FDA. This highly selective and potent competitive CGRP receptor antagonist possesses remarkable aqueous solubility, making it suitable for nasal delivery, and demonstrates excellent oxidative stability 
Design/Methods:

A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases to identify relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Two RCTs, involving a total of 2850 participants, were selected for quantitative analysis. An additional trial was included for qualitative synthesis. The primary efficacy outcome assessed was freedom from pain at 2 hours post-dose. Safety outcomes were evaluated based on adverse events (AEs), with zavegepant 10 mg and placebo groups compared for incidence of AEs.

Results:

The analysis shows that zavegepant 10 mg exhibited a significantly higher likelihood of achieving freedom from pain at 2 hours post-dose compared to the placebo group (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.84). Additionally, zavegepant 10 mg demonstrated superior freedom from the most bothersome symptoms (MBS) at 2 hours post-dose compared to placebo (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.42). However, the zavegepant 10 mg group experienced a higher incidence of adverse events compared to placebo (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.12), with dysgeusia being the most reported AE (RR 4.18, 95% CI 3.05 to 5.72).

Conclusions:

According to our analysis,zavegepant 10 mg was more effective than placebo for treatment of acute migraine attacks.This provides compelling evidence that zavegepant is an effective acute treatment option for migraine, effectively relieving migraine pain, and most bothersome symptoms. Real-world studies are needed to confirm the efficacy, tolerability, and safety in clinic-based settings consisting of heterogeneous patient populations. 

10.1212/WNL.0000000000206456