Understanding Burden and Health Outcomes Based on Number of Adverse Events in Patients with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome in Real-world Clinical Practice Settings
Drishti Shah1, J. Scott Andrews1, Arturo Benitez1, Jonathan DeCourcy2, Yasmin Taylor2, Hannah Connolly2, Sophie Lai2, Vicente Villanueva3
1Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., 2Adelphi Real World, 3Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
Objective:
To quantify the incremental treatment burden of adverse events (AEs) among patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) receiving antiseizure medication (ASM).
Background:
LGS is a severe form of treatment-resistant childhood-onset epilepsy. Use of multiple ASMs frequently results in AEs and drug–drug interactions.
Design/Methods:
Data for this retrospective cross-sectional analysis were derived from the real-world Adelphi LGS Disease Specific Programme (DSPTM). Neurologists/pediatric neurologists provided information on treatment patterns, AEs (from a pre-specified list) per treatment regimen, non-seizure symptoms, and resource use. Data were stratified by number of AEs (0–1; 2; 3+) irrespective of number of ASMs prescribed and compared using bivariate testing.
Results:
Of 803 patients (mean age 14.7 years), 117 (15%) experienced 2 AEs and 139 (17%) 3+ AEs. Mean number of current ASMs per patient was similar across groups (0–1 AEs, 2.5; 2 AEs, 2.4; 3+ AEs, 2.6). Mean number of seizure-related injuries experienced (last 6 months) was significantly higher among patients with 3+ AEs (overall, 7.0; head injuries, 1.5) than with 0–1 (1.3 and 0.3, respectively) or 2 AEs (2.3 and 0.6) (p<0.0001). Non-seizure burden (last 4 weeks) was also higher among patients with 3+ AEs versus 0–1 or 2 AEs, especially the proportions of patients having difficulty with gait, dysphasia, and cognitive impairment (all p<0.05). The proportions of patients with ≥1 hospitalization event, ≥1 ER visits, and ≥1 outpatient visits over the last 12 months were highest among those with 3+ AEs (all p<0.0001). Proportions with very poor to somewhat poor quality of life (p=0.0006) were also highest among those with 3+ AEs.
Conclusions:
Despite similar ASM use across groups, patients with more AEs (versus fewer) experienced a substantial clinical burden and greater healthcare resource use suggesting a potentially more vulnerable population. There is a clear need for new LGS treatments with a better tolerability profile.