Child Development After Exposure to Monoclonal Antibodies During Breastfeeding
Laura Witt1, Sandra Thiel1, Ralf Gold2, Kerstin Hellwig3
1Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany, 2Neurologische Universitaetsklinik, 3St. Josef Hospital Bochum
Objective:

To analyze how infants breastfed under monoclonal antibodies (mAb) develop during the first 36 months of life.

Background:

Most mAbs used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) are not approved for use during lactation. Studies on excretion of other mAbs used in MS therapy show low transfer into breast milk and no adverse effects on exposed infants, but clinical data are limited.

Design/Methods:

Live births with (≥1 day) or without mAb exposure during breastfeeding and ≥6 months follow-up were identified in the German MS and Pregnancy Registry. Primary outcomes (hospitalizations, systemic antibiotic use, developmental delay, weight at follow-up visits) were compared between breastfed mAb-exposed (exposed group) and unexposed (control group) infants. We matched groups for disease modifying therapy exposure during pregnancy and performed adjusted linear, logistic and poisson regression analyses.

Results:

We identified 183 mAb breastfed exposed cases (median follow-up 1 year, range 0.5-3) with a diagnosis of MS (n=180) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease (n=3), with no significant differences in demographic characteristics compared to the control group (n=183).

MAb exposure during breastfeeding started on median day 19 (range 0-293) postpartum (median duration 172 days, range 2-1104). Natalizumab (n=125/68.31%) was most commonly used, followed by ocrelizumab (n=34/18.58%), rituximab (n=11/6.01%), and ofatumumab (n=10/5.46%); therapy was switched from natalizumab to ocrelizumab in 2 cases (1.09%), from rituximab to ocrelizumab in 1 case (0.55%) while breastfeeding. Three children had been previously breastfed on glatiramer acetate and two on interferons.

Adjusted regression analyses showed no association of annual hospitalization (rate ratio 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70,2.16; p 0.473), annual systemic antibiotic use (rate ratio 1.55; 95%CI 0.93,2.57; p 0.093), developmental delay (odds ratio [OR] 1.16; 95%CI 0.52,2.60; p 0.716), or weight at follow-up visits with mAb-exposed breastfeeding.


 

Conclusions:

Our data show that mAb exposure during breastfeeding had no negative effect on the development or health of breastfed infants.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000204895