Automated Deep Brain Stimulation Programming Combining Electrophysiology and Artificial Intelligence
Venkat Lavu1, Jackson Cagle1, Tiberio de Araujo1, Coralie de Hemptinne1, Joshua Wong1
1Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida
Objective:
To predict the best clinical contact in deep brain stimulation therapy using electrophysiology and artificial intelligence.
Background:
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, DBS programming is a manual and time consuming process done by clinical experts over many in-clinic visits. Modern DBS technology allows for local field potential (LFP) recording in implanted DBS systems. We sought to leverage this LFP data through machine-learning (ML) to develop automated algorithms that facilitate DBS programming workflow.
Design/Methods:
We conducted a retrospective study using the INFORM clinical research database at the University of Florida of PD patients implanted with Medtronic Percept PC neurostimulator. We selected patients who completed 4 months of DBS programming and had LFPs obtained on initial visit. We evaluated several ML-models designed to predict “dorsal” or “ventral” contact use at the 4th month programming visit based on LFPs obtained from initial visit.
Results:
For 76 patients who met inclusion criteria (9 STN, 66 GPi, 1 VIM), power spectral density (PSD) was calculated by applying short-time Fourier transform on their LFPs. The PSDs were separated into predefined frequency bands: alpha 8-12Hz, low-beta 13-20Hz, high-beta 21-30Hz, gamma 30Hz or greater. Average power in these bands were input features for the ML-models, which were evaluated across 5-fold cross validation testing design. Ensemble based Extra-Trees classifier, with mean (SD) area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 67.5 (16.6) and mean (SD) F1-score of 73.9 (8.8) had best performance. Gradient boosting based CatBoost with mean (SD) AUC-ROC of 64.3 (15.4) and mean (SD) F1-score of 71.2 (7.9) had second best performance.
Conclusions:
We demonstrate that LFP data can inform contact selection for DBS programming. This sets the foundation towards an automated algorithm that can significantly decrease clinical burden and DBS programming time in patients with newly implanted DBS.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000204621